When you retain an attorney, you retain someone who is part of a service profession.
Your engagement will be staffed to position you to achieve your goals. Our attorneys and staff work with cutting-edge technology, the key to managing a litigation practice, including Amicus Attorney™, CaseMap™, TimeMap™ and TextMap™. We maintain file documents electronically, reducing the effort to answer your questions, reducing your cost, and increasing our efficiency. When our cases go to trial, we use Litigation Pad™, Document Review Pad™ and Text Pad™, to present your story to the judge or jury smoothly.
We believe we provide exemplary value for our services, and we suggest immediately a discussion about our fees and what your specific engagement will cost. We do not shy away from that discussion and will revisit it whenever you wish. You should know what a specific matter will cost you, and we do our best to predict that cost by considering all relevant factors.
Our attorneys meet weekly to discuss all active cases, strategies and next steps. Our attorneys meet with their staff daily to manage the day’s work and view the coming week. This results in efficient, cost-effective representation.
We retained Tony and his firm to handle complex litigation with a competitor in Connecticut. His extraordinary efforts and skilled handling of the case enabled us to receive desirable results and we certainly would engage Tony again. We recommend him to others in need of a highly competent, qualified and diligent attorney.
Wow Twitter blocked as sensitive content my tweet about a bill the CT legislature is debating on employment law and wages. I think its a bad bill, but not that bad twitter...
Read MoreCT Gen. Assembly discussing a bill that requires ERs to disclose wage range for a position (could be what you have budgeted) when you offer a job and once a year. I am pretty moderate, and this strikes me as overlegislating. And I am understating. https://t.co/Sxrz4zJcFl
Read More
Bloggers beware. In this case, be thankful. Yesterday the DC district court of appeals reversed denial of SLAPP special motion to dismiss where blogger published alleged defamatory statements uttered by someone else.
Read MoreSCOTUS ruled yesterday Muslims can sue FBI for placing them on no-fly list as retaliation for refusing to cooperate with counterterrorism investigations. Interesting balance on religion and governmental immunity.
Read MoreKind of the way a lawyer should prepare his/her client.
Read MoreThe rush from the cities (NYC mostly) to rural Connecticut and upstate New York is bringing back that lovely old equitable remedy SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE!! Oh I love contracts. And specific performance even more.
Read MoreWith jobless claims so high, more small businesses are fighting unemployment. "Refusing suitable employment," is the biggest issue per DOL. Employers should be prepared with proof of PPE compliance if they want to defeat a claim because they offered the employee their job back. https://t.co/L5kM4L6qCF
Read More
With jobless claims so high, more small businesses are fighting unemployment. "Refusing suitable employment," is the biggest issue per DOL. Employers should be prepared with proof of PPE compliance if they want to defeat a claim because they offered the employee their job back. https://t.co/xoBslJOgLc
Read More
DE Sup. Court, epicenter for biz litigation, answered yesterday a certified question from 9th Circuit.LP must prove reliance and causation when suing GP for failure to disclose material info in one-time request for capital contribution. LP does not get benefit of per se rule.
Read MoreWow. Maybe this isn't that much of a big deal. What was the underlying evidence? With the "but for" standard under federal law this surprises me a bit.
Read More
© 2020 Minchella & Associates, LLC
Disclaimer & Privacy Policy
